URGENT: My son's safety and access to independent legal counsel cannot wait.

Follow the documented record. Help secure independent counsel.

Documented Timeline

A chronological record — phase by phase, source by source.

These are separate roles and events. I am not alleging coordination without evidence. Entries are ordered chronologically by phase. Items without a verified public date are labeled "Documentation pending publication." Each entry carries a source-status badge; nothing is labeled verified unless a source is present.

  1. Phase 01 · Where this case startsRecord available

    Undisclosed bank account balances

    This case starts with undisclosed bank account balances that surfaced during financial disclosure in the New Mexico family-court proceedings. These undisclosed balances are the originating event documented in the record. Specific accounts and figures are being compiled for publication.

  2. Phase 02 · Pre-proceedingsDocumentation pending publication

    The roles and the relationship

    My former attorney also became my former partner. These overlapping professional and personal roles frame the conflict-of-interest concern that appears later in the record. The roles are separate; no coordination is alleged.

  3. Phase 03 · Family-court proceedings beginDocumentation pending publication

    Proceedings involving my son begin

    New Mexico family-court proceedings concerning my son begin. The case number and filing date are being compiled for publication.

  4. Phase 04 · During the proceedingsRecord available

    The conflict of interest is raised

    The conflict of interest created by my former attorney’s overlapping roles is raised and reflected in the record.

  5. Phase 05 · On the recordRecord available

    A recusal is reflected in the record

    A recusal appears in the record. The specific matter and date are pending publication here, but the recusal itself is reflected in the record.

  6. Phase 06 · After the recusalRecord available

    Proceedings continue after the recusal

    Proceedings continued after the recusal, reflected in the record. How those later proceedings reflected the recusal is part of the documented question.

  7. Phase 07 · Later in the recordDocumentation pending publication

    A vexatious-litigant designation and filing restrictions

    A later vexatious-litigant designation and associated filing restrictions appear in the record. Details are being compiled for publication.

  8. Phase 08 · Ongoing outreachDocumentation pending publication

    More than 20 New Mexico law firms contacted

    Independent counsel remained unsecured after outreach to more than 20 New Mexico law firms. The outreach record is maintained.

  9. Phase 09 · During and after the proceedingsRecord available

    The judge, the Guardian ad Litem, and the therapist

    A judge oversees the family-court proceedings concerning my son. A Guardian ad Litem (GAL) is appointed to represent my son’s best interests. A therapist is involved with my son in connection with the proceedings. Each role is separate; their involvement is reflected in the record.

  10. Phase 10 · A documented concernRecord available

    A connected network and overlooked child safety

    A documented concern is raised that the judge, the GAL, and the therapist are connected, and that across these connected roles my son’s safety was overlooked. This is raised as a documented concern and an allegation, not a finding. It returns to the central question of this record: who is protecting him?

  11. Phase 11 · CurrentRecord available

    Child-safety concerns and scheduled-exchange disputes

    Current child-safety concerns, scheduled-exchange disputes, and requests for court review — including a written communication stating that "makeup" parenting time would continue while invoking an unidentified court order.

  12. Phase 12 · This projectRecord available

    NMAR publishes the record

    This documentation project publishes the record in roles-only, source-stamped form. Personal identifiers are redacted; allegations are identified as allegations.

These are separate roles and events. I am not alleging coordination without evidence.

Where I make a claim in this project, substantive and material evidence exists to support it. Every assertion documented here is backed by records maintained for verification.

NM Attorney Review (NMAR) • Documenting the Record

Independent project — not affiliated with the New Mexico courts, the State Bar of New Mexico, or disciplinary authorities. Materials include public records, correspondence, and first-person accounts, each identified by source type. Allegations are identified as allegations. This site does not make legal findings or provide legal advice. Personal identifiers have been redacted.

This record is sustained by readers.

If this documentation matters to you, a donation helps keep it online and supports the effort to secure independent counsel. No tax, legal, or custody outcome is promised.

Support documentation and independent legal advocacy

© 2026 NM Attorney Review (NMAR). An independent documentation project. Corrections: contact.